Press

Amber Rose McNeill has been directing films and facilitating Intimacy Coordination since 2017, and editing films since 2020. In 2023 Amber Rose founded the Milwaukee Illuminate Film Festival, and serves as the Festival Director and Lead Programmer.


The world of independent film in Milwaukee is expanding with the Milwaukee Illuminate Film Festival, a new event spearheaded by festival director and Peck School graduate Amber McNeill (BFA 2023, Film). McNeill, who is also lead programmer, is joined by fellow PSOA alum Zoe Lufman (BFA 2023, Film), who serves as operations manager and programmer. 

McNeill and Lufman met at UWM during their senior-year film course and immediately embraced their commonalities. Lufman described feeling “intrigued by another queer, tattooed, Jewish filmmaker [with] a lot more experience… we just started collaborating and the rest is history.”  

Following graduation, McNeill pursued creating her film festival: “I knew I wanted to do something bigger than myself with my BFA. The more I thought about it, the more I wanted to do something inclusive for all the artists and filmmakers whose work gets overlooked.”  

MIFF comes from a place of love for the film industry and a desire to see diversity improve at a faster rate than it currently is.  

McNeill has noted a desire to not have MIFF stand on its own, hoping that “other festivals like this pop up” throughout Milwaukee, the Midwest, and beyond. Additionally, with multiple times and screenings, their festival gives marginalized filmmakers the opportunity to socialize and build community. This is well represented in the festival’s program that allows marginalized filmmakers to apply for complimentary tickets.  

Their time at the Peck School was heavily influential to both McNeill and Lufman when running and operating MIFF. Both credit their experience taking an internship course with Milwaukee Underground Film Festival (MUFF) as playing a major role in how they approached their festival. 

“It provided actual work within the community and the ability to meet people that we still work with now,” she said, adding that learning how to program and collaborate with others on an event was among the most important aspects she took from her internship. 

Adding to Lufman’s comments, McNeill commented that “MUFF offered programming experience, providing the necessary bits and pieces needed” to make MIFF a reality. 

Outside of festival experience, they both acknowledged that working with 16mm film, an incredibly rare and unique opportunity that PSOA film students get, was one of their educational highlights. Lufman shot her entire Senior film on 16mm, not wanting to miss out on the unique opportunity.  

Peck School is well-represented in all aspects of Milwaukee Illuminate, including alumni and current students’ films being screened, a recent alum on the festival’s jury, and involvement from many other colleagues from McNeill and Lufman’s time at PSOA. 

Read more on the Milwaukee Illuminate Film Festival website.  

Hosted by Ross Bigley (MKE Short Film Fest).

Moderated by Michael Viers.

Featuring Amber Rose McNeill (Festival Director and Programmer for Milwaukee Illuminate Film Festival)

and

Theophilus Jamal (Vieutopia International Motion Picture Festival)

On today’s Shame List Picture Show episode, Michael is joined by two special guests. First off, returning for their 6th appearance on SLPS we have Josephine Maria Yanasak-Leszczysnki. On top of that, we also have a first-time guest Amber Rose McNeill who is a filmmaker, intimacy coordinator, and founder of the Milwaukee Illuminate Film Festival. On today’s episode, we will discuss David Lynch’s controversial yet influential film BLUE VELVET. Topics discussed are the Queer themes of BLUE VELVET, the way violence is presented, trauma, and a healthy discussion on the age we were when first seeing BLUE VELVET.

MEET THE FILMMAKERS MKE SHORT FILM FEST 2023 WITH LEGACY FILMMAKER AMBER ROSE MCNEILL

Writer and Director Amber Rose McNeill chats with Festival Runner Ross Bigley about personal cinema, Jewish and queer identity, as well as being both in front of and behind the camera

RED CARPET INTERVIEW AT THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY FESTIVAL PHILADELPHIA 2022

Hosted by Nic LaRue from Film Snobbery, featuring Director Amber Rose McNeill and Lead Actor Brent Roberts

LIVE Q&A PANEL WITH WISCONSIN FILMMAKERS FILM GIRL FILM FESTIVAL 2022

Hosted by Andrea Thompson, featuring Amber Rose McNeill, Gabriella Cisneros, Jojin Van Winkle, Erika Kirkstein-Zastrow

MEET THE FILMMAKERS MKE SHORT FILM FEST 2022 WITH GUEST AMBER ROSE MCNEILL

Director and Producer Amber Rose McNeill chats with Festival Runner Ross Bigley about the consumption and fetishisation of the violent image

HORROR FILM AWARDS SPOTLIGHT 2021

Amber Rose McNeill - Writer, Director, Producer of Queer Horror Film Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs

Can you say something about yourself?

Sure! I’m originally from Australia but am currently based in Wisconsin. I spent a number of years studying and working in LA, where Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs was shot. I’m a queer filmmaker, and although my films don’t always center around queerness, I do tend to challenge norms and stereotypes relating to gender and sexuality in my work. As well as making more traditional narrative-type horror films, I’m an appropriated media artist. I focus more on satire, critique, and commentary in this medium. A common thread in my work is the examination of societal attitudes towards violence, and the way violent media is consumed, via different lenses; female, queer, genderqueer. 

Your film has entered our Horror Film Awards. What is your film about?

Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs is a queer horror film that follows a bored office worker (Amile) as he falls head over heels for a man (Andrew) he’s never met, seen, or spoken to. Amile becomes more focused on the affection he is projecting onto Andrew, than the realities of their relationship. Because of his infatuation, he misses a lot of red flags, and ends up in a vulnerable position with a stranger. The film is ultimately a modern fable about the delirium and disillusionment that can accompany dating in the digital age.

What are your ambitions with your project?

I wanted to break a lot of the norms we see in the horror genre. Often, we see that straight couples or romances are the default in horror films. Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs is a story that centers around two queer men, played by queer actors. That was very important to me in the making of the film. Now that the film is completed, I really want to give people the opportunity to see the film. That’s my main ambition now. We have an in-person premiere coming up, and the only way to watch the film, at the moment, will be via festivals. I’m excited for people to see it.

Who is your greatest role model?

I’m not sure if I really have one. I have people who I admire and people who have supported me. It’s a lot of pressure to put onto another person to be a role model. 

Kevin Smith had always been a filmmaker I admired. I saw a lot of feminist undertones in his work growing up that are still often overlooked. He was also incredibly kind to me the few times we crossed paths when I first moved to LA and was supportive of my writing before I made the switch to film. His reactions to my jokes and the pacing/structure of my writing gave me the confidence to see that I could move people with my words.

Soda Jerk, who are also Australian filmmakers based in the US, are two artists that I really look up to. They’ve been kind in supporting my film work. I would love to be able to put out the caliber of work that they do. They have a unique voice and impeccable artistry.

Which movies are your favorites? Why?

Oh, man… a lot of experimental shorts that most people have never heard of. I love 21-87 by Arthur Lipsett for the social commentary he is able to express using a mix of found footage and his own film. Sodom by Luther Price is an appropriated media piece that I find very beautiful for the way it challenges heteronormative views of film and pornography. It’s also disturbing in the way it is constructed, definitely not a film for the faint hearted, it is quite intense.

In mainstream film, I’m a big fan of Ari Aster’s work, particularly Midsommar. Aster creates very realistic and full female characters, who are primary characters, not just props or plot points for male characters. His films are also visually stunning and he works closely with his post sound crew to create these wonderfully immersive films. Midsommar is a female revenge film told in a very unique way. It speaks to me as both a filmmaker and an audience member.

Red State is an intelligent and impactful horror film. A lot of people don’t know it’s based on a real life interview a queer friend of Kevin Smith’s conducted with Fred Phelps. It’s a well-crafted film that still fills me with dread to watch.

Heathers is an all-time favorite. I’ve probably seen it close to 100 times by now. I’m pretty sure I wore out the VHS copy at my local video store when I was a kid. It’s a really cool film, but it is also a feminist film. I think a lot of my influence comes from 80s films with strong female characters that were sick of the status quo or toxic systems and then just end up doing their own thing.

Why should distributors buy your film?

Queer horror needs to be elevated, and one of the ways to do this is to have distributors buy queer films and get them on platforms so that audiences can watch them. We need to see more diversity in the horror genre; more women directors and producers, more queer women creating horror content, more queer stories made by queer people with queer actors playing queer characters. We’re out here making films; we just need distributors to pick up our films and content. 

How would you specify your work? What characterizes your film?

I make a lot of weird and absurdist leaning films, but I also make some pretty hard-hitting social commentary films as well. Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs is a little softer than some of my work, which feels weird to say since it is quite creepy and violent. Aesthetically, and dialogue wise, it’s a softer film in comparison to a lot of my other work. I guess high concept meets violent critique could encompass a lot of my work, Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs, in particular. It’s not always an easy sell, but this film contains a lot more in terms of representation, queer themes, and social commentary.

How was the shooting? What pleasantly surprised you?

Shooting was pretty stressful. From setup to breakdown, we had three eight-hour days to shoot everything. I was really proud of how much work my crew put in. We were a small but mighty force who coordinated well and worked as a cohesive team. My actors, Brent and Travis, were both a dream to direct and brought an amazing energy to the set. I’m pleasantly surprised we got a 12-page script shot in that tiny time frame. 

For what target group is your film?

I’d like to think that Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs is for anyone who likes horror films but I realize that queer horror is still somewhat a niche subgenre (although this is slowly changing). Fans of psychological and intellectual horror are likely to gravitate towards it. And I really hope that queer audiences like what we’ve achieved with this film. It is a queer horror film written, directed, produced, and designed by a queer filmmaker and three out of the four actors in the film are queer. 

Why did you decide to become a filmmaker?

I’ve been around the film and television industry my entire life. The first thing I learnt how to do, workwise, was dress a set with my dad when I was around five years old. I think I secretly always wanted to make films, but I was more driven towards science-based education and jobs. I had been writing as a music journalist for a long time and had started writing more about film when I moved to LA. There sort of came a point where I thought, if I’m going to do this- it has to be now. Even when I started going to film school, I’m not sure I saw myself as a filmmaker. But every time there was the opportunity to make a film, I jumped on it. I’d been making films for about three years before I started referring to myself as a filmmaker. Now I can’t imagine doing anything else. I love the ability to express a point of view, to ask people to question existing beliefs and norms, and to be able to guide people’s emotions through storytelling.

Where do you look for inspiration for your films?

Definitely in all the films and artists I mentioned in the last two questions. I find a lot of inspiration in Robert Mapplethorpe’s photography. Art and literature are a great source of inspiration in general. The paintings of Artemisia Gentileschi. Writers such as Luce Irigaray, Oyinkan Braithwaite, and Ottessa Moshfegh. David Bowie… I’ll take inspiration from anywhere and everywhere.

 

Which topics interest you the most?

The ways in which we, as a culture, consume violence in media. Whether that be in fictional forms or in real life events. I’m also interested in examining and challenging social attitudes with regard to gender and sexuality. Feminist film theory has always been interesting to me. Telling horror stories in unique ways and finding genuine ways to deviate from the norm are also important to me.

What incites you about a horror genre?

I’ve loved horror since I was a kid, be it short stories or films. I love the lighting and color palettes that are common to this genre. Horror has a unique ability to provoke a vast array of emotions, and I’m really excited when I see a horror film that utilizes this to its full potential. I also really like horror that carries a social message or breaks some of the usual horror tropes. There’s a lot of really cool stuff happening within the contemporary horror genre. It’s a genre that’s capable of expansion.

What do you consider your greatest achievement?

Every film I make is an achievement. Some require more blood, sweat, and tears than others. Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs took a really long time to get through post. The edit was tricky and I was adamant about getting the sound and composing right. My composer and sound designer deserves a lot of the credit for that. 

I’ve won a Best Film award and a Best Editing award, I’ve been nominated for my writing and overall filmmaking, which has been pretty great. I received a scholarship for my film work at university which has also been validating.

Honestly, and this is going to sound corny, but seeing people enjoy and connect with my films has been, and continues to be, my favorite achievement.

MEET THE FILMMAKERS MKE SHORT FILM FEST 2021 WITH GUEST AMBER ROSE MCNEILL

Director and Producer Amber Rose McNeill chats with Festival Runner Ross Bigley about challenging normative sexuality and traditional gender roles

Two Minutes on High challenges the deeply ingrained concepts of normative sexuality and traditional gender roles via a metaphoric exploration of the four phases of the sexual response cycle: desire, arousal, climax, and resolution. Desire and arousal take a more commercialized approach, commenting on the heteronormative sexual programming that is heavily reinforced by the consumption of mainstream cinema and online pornography; the two predominant mediums via which we frequently observe sex. Climax and resolution explore the impact that power dynamics and gender roles have on the expression of sexuality and sexual practices within western culture. The introduction of sounds and images that bend and break these norms encourage the viewer to reconsider the effects that social conditioning and media consumption play in our perceptions and behavior surrounding sexuality and gender.

Amber Rose McNeill is an Australian film director and appropriated media artist based in Wisconsin. Her work focuses on societal attitudes towards violence, dark psychology and challenging normative concepts of sexuality. Amber Rose frequently examines the relationship that media and popular culture play in the consumption of violence within western society. Her current projects serve to rework traditional structures within the horror genre to further queer narratives in addition to creating more films made via the female, and gender queer, lens.

How did you start making films and what was the first film project you worked on?

The first film I ever made was shot on an old VHS camcorder and edited on an analogue tape editor in my final year of high school. It was a terrible film that was a knock off exploitation film, but I look back fondly now because I can appreciate teaching myself how to use analogue editing equipment at 17 years of age.

The first proper film I made was a 48hr film challenge while I was at film school in LA. It was a neo-noir short that I produced and co-wrote. It was a nightmare to shoot but having grown up on film sets, the skills I had picked up there, all kind of kicked in under pressure and we ended up with a moody little short film that was actually pretty cool. That was four years ago, and I have been consistently making short films ever since.

How did your project go into production and how did you finalize the cast and the crew?

Two Minutes on High isn’t a traditionally made film. So, I didn’t have to deal with a lengthy preproduction process or deal with cast or crew. Making appropriated media pieces is a very different process. It relies heavily on concept, commentary, research, finding materials, editing, and post sound work. Creating a transformative piece of art from existing materials tends to lend itself more to social commentary and/or critique than a traditional narrative. It’s a different beast with an entirely different process from traditional or mainstream cinema.

How was the film received by your audience and film festivals and what is your plan for further distribution of the film?

It’s been received really well. We’ve had a solid festival run and received great feedback. Two Minutes on High has mostly been picked up by women’s film festivals and underground festivals, which is great. We just took the Festival Award for Experimental Short last night at the Topaz Festival by Women in Film Dallas, which was super exciting. Coming first in your category always feels really good, but it feels particularly good with this film.

What do you recommend to other filmmakers regarding the making and the distribution of independent films?

Make the art you want to make. Make the films you want to make. Worry more about making the films you want to see than what’s going to sell tickets. You’ll end up with more interesting films that way. Believing in your work and knowing your craft does a lot to help you promote a film once it’s completed. Filmmaking is only one side of the equation. If you’re looking to get your film picked up for distribution you really need to learn the business side of filmmaking (i.e., distribution and sales) as well as the production side of filmmaking.

What is your next film project and what are you currently working on?

I’ve recently completed a film that’s just started its festival run, Andrew Ginger/Likes Dogs. It’s a queer horror film about the dangers and disillusionment of modern dating. I’m really proud of this film because it is written, produced, directed, and designed by a queer woman (me), and my two main actors are queer men playing queer characters. It’s a really special film and I’m so happy it’s finally meeting the world.

I’ve also started preproduction on a 16mm film that follows a female serial killer via the female lens. I’m really excited to shoot another film on 16mm. It involves a lot more time and care than shooting digital but I have a fantastic cinematographer that I met in film school. I’m very much looking forward to collaborating with her on this film.

Why do you make films?

I guess it’s in my blood and upbringing, but I sort of can’t stop now that I’ve started. When I couldn’t shoot with cast and crew during lockdown, I started making appropriated media pieces. I love creating cinema and will change or adapt in order to keep making films. I love that I’m not confided to one style of filmmaking. I make traditional narrative films, but also shoot experimental 16mm shorts, and cut together appropriated media pieces. I just love expanding my knowledge and skills because I love making films.

What was the inspiration behind the making of your film?

I had started working in appropriated media, or sampling, during the first lockdown in the US. I couldn’t work with a crew or actors and I didn’t want to stop making films. I found out very quickly that I had an apt for this kind of filmmaking. Two Minutes on High was the third film I’ve made in this style of filmmaking. I wanted to make a film that hit hard and fast in a way that felt all consuming and highly stimulating.

Discussions that challenge concepts of normative sexuality and gender have always been important to me as an artist and this style of filmmaking lends itself perfectly to exploring all these themes. I decided early on to structure the film around the sexual response cycle, it was my first attempt at a structural film but I found having that intent and architecture really helped the film to take shape. Appropriated media is particularly impactful for social commentary and drawing social critiques.

What is the most challenging aspect of being an independent female filmmaker in the film industry?

Being taken seriously by men in the industry. Mostly I pick my crew based on who I am most confident and comfortable working with when it comes to my own films. But I have worked on other people’s films as a 1st or 2nd AD, or an Executive Producer, and have had many male crew members refuse to follow directions or just straight out fight my authority/ability to run a set. Pitching projects and seeking funding can also be an issue. Often if a man finds a woman attractive, he won’t take her seriously in these situations. Being dismissed, ignored, or fought when I’m just doing my job has been the most challenging part of being a woman in this industry.

How difficult is it to fund indie films?

It takes a lot of work, time, and effort. Thankfully there are tools like GoFundMe and IndieGoGo that make it a lot easier to get the word about your project out there, but that’s like a full-time job until you reach funding (which doesn’t always happen). There is a skill to it and you need to learn the tips and tricks. You’re still essentially relying on donations from friends and strangers to fund your project. It can be tough. Having an understanding of traditional film funding, pitching, and the studio system is really helpful when it comes to indie funding methods. It makes you appreciate the freedom you have as a filmmaker when you fund independently. Retaining creative control is well worth the effort involved in sourcing your own funding independent of studios.

What was the inspiration behind the making of your film?

I had started working in appropriated media, or sampling, during the first lockdown in the US. I couldn’t work with a crew or actors and I didn’t want to stop making films. I found out very quickly that I had an apt for this kind of filmmaking. Two Minutes on High was the third film I’ve made in this style of filmmaking. I wanted to make a film that hit hard and fast in a way that felt all consuming and highly stimulating.

Discussions that challenge concepts of normative sexuality and gender have always been important to me as an artist and this style of filmmaking lends itself perfectly to exploring all these themes. I decided early on to structure the film around the sexual response cycle, it was my first attempt at a structural film but I found having that intent and architecture really helped the film to take shape. Appropriated media is particularly impactful for social commentary and drawing social critiques.

What is the most challenging aspect of being an independent female filmmaker in the film industry?

Being taken seriously by men in the industry. Mostly I pick my crew based on who I am most confident and comfortable working with when it comes to my own films. But I have worked on other people’s films as a 1st or 2nd AD, or an Executive Producer, and have had many male crew members refuse to follow directions or just straight out fight my authority/ability to run a set. Pitching projects and seeking funding can also be an issue. Often if a man finds a woman attractive, he won’t take her seriously in these situations. Being dismissed, ignored, or fought when I’m just doing my job has been the most challenging part of being a woman in this industry.

How difficult is it to fund indie films?

It takes a lot of work, time, and effort. Thankfully there are tools like GoFundMe and IndieGoGo that make it a lot easier to get the word about your project out there, but that’s like a full-time job until you reach funding (which doesn’t always happen). There is a skill to it and you need to learn the tips and tricks. You’re still essentially relying on donations from friends and strangers to fund your project. It can be tough. Having an understanding of traditional film funding, pitching, and the studio system is really helpful when it comes to indie funding methods. It makes you appreciate the freedom you have as a filmmaker when you fund independently. Retaining creative control is well worth the effort involved in sourcing your own funding independent of studios.

Please name three of your most favorite directors. How have they been influential in your work?

I grew up watching a lot of David Lynch’s work from a very young age. I’ve always found his work to be exciting and fascinating. I enjoy films with deeper meanings that the audience may not be privy to. I like being confused and/or not being handed a neatly wrapped ending. The weirdness that Lynch harnesses on screen, and his aesthetic, is really something else.

Ari Aster is an incredible filmmaker. He and Jordan Peele have elevated horror to a prestige level. Aster is so involved with every aspect of the filmmaking process, particularly sound, which results in these intense, immersive pieces of film. I was taken under the wing of the sound department at my first film school and became really attached to film sound. I also focus a lot of my time as a filmmaker on the sound process. Aster also creates these strong, complex, and fully developed female characters. His films are disturbing and fascinating, but also exceptionally beautiful.

Claire Denis does amazing work that is very focused on the human body which I really respond to. She shoots on location a lot as opposed to shooting on sound stages which is something I’m moving more into myself. The cinematography in Denis’ films is so unique to her cinematic visions. She’s able to capture these wider shots that act as still photographs with characters moving within the still frames. She also makes the films she wants to make in the way she wants to make them, and that is incredibly inspirational as a female filmmaker.

LIVE Q&A WITH MILWAUKEE FILMMAKERS FILM GIRL FILM FESTIVAL 2020

Hosted by Andrea Thompson, Segment Amber Rose McNeill featuring Amber Rose McNeill

Livestream interview as part of the Film Girl Film Festival 2020 recorded at Nō Studios, Milwaukee

Full Video Film Girl Film Festival Interviews with Milwaukee Filmmakers featuring Robyn Ehrlich, Paula Lovo, Amber Rose McNeill, Lauren Barker, Shalyse & Marisa Merkl available here

LIVE Q&A PANEL WITH WISCONSIN DIRECTORS FILM GIRL FILM FESTIVAL 2020

Hosted by Andrea Thompson, featuring Amber Rose McNeill, Robyn Ehrlich, Paula Lovo, Lauren Barker, Shalyse, & Marisa Merkl

Interview with Director Amber Rose McNeill by Matthew Toffolo on her film Normal Porn for Normal People, violence in the media and appropriated cinema

NORMAL PORN FOR NORMAL PEOPLE PLAYED TO RAVE REVIEWS AT THE AUGUST 2020 HORROR FEEDBACK FILM FESTIVAL

Matthew Toffolo: What motivated you to make this film?

Amber Rose McNeill: I had this urge to really dig into the way that we consume violence within our cultures (Australian culture because I’m an Australian filmmaker, and North American culture because I’m based out of Wisconsin). Appropriated media gave me this amazing way in which to juxtapose violence against consumerism and sexuality in this really impactful and provocative way.

From the idea to the finished product, how long did it take for you to make this short?

It was quite a quick process in comparison to much of my other work. I think it was around 3 weeks in total, maybe a little less. I had the title “Normal Porn for Normal People” basically on a loop in my head for around a week before the overall commentary I wanted to express started to emerge. The bulk of the film was created in one 20hr editing session. After that it was just a matter of fine tuning the timing of the cuts.

How would you describe your short film in two words!?

Carnal Consumerism!

What was the biggest obstacle you faced in completing this film?

Working with appropriated media is a challenge in itself. It’s a dangerous balancing act of rebellion because you’re repurposing existing media into a transformative new piece of art. It’s a very punk rock way of making films, which is part of its appeal but also comes with a lot of anxieties.

What were your initial reactions when watching the audience talking about your film in the feedback video?

I was elated that my film was so well received and that the commentary I was making had the desired effect. I am a firm believer in provoking thought and questioning the societal status quo via the use of cinema; it’s something I aim to do with even my more absurdist work. It was a very reaffirming moment for me as a filmmaker to be able to absorb the feedback of an audience’s perception of my piece.

How did you come up with the idea for this short film?

I had the title in my head repeating on this loop. The title, “Normal Porn for Normal People,” comes from a short story about the depraved depths of the dark web. That started me thinking about the way that violent imagery has become a type of pseudo pornography. I wanted to comment on the way that we salivate over violence in this sexualised way, and yet we demonise sexuality as this scapegoat to violent acts. Consumerism in general has a lot to answer for, and this film was my way of giving a provocative tongue-in-cheek poke at that establishment.

What film have you seen the most in your life?

Probably “Heathers” dir. Michael Lehmann. I was obsessed with it as a child and only continued to grow my appreciation as an adult. I must have seen it hundreds of times by now. It’s a cult classic for a reason.

You submitted to the festival via FilmFreeway, what are your feelings of the submission platform from a filmmaker’s perspective?

It’s a user-friendly platform. It’s easy to edit or update submissions. Overall it just really takes the hassle out of applying to multiple festivals.

What song have you listened to the most times in your life?

“WHITE” by The Left Rights. The cultural satire is on point and very relevant in the context of 2020. The film clip is also super cool.

What is next for you? A new film?

Quite a lot actually… I’m in the middle of writing a short film that’s a mashup of genres; horror, romance, feminist film, buddy movie. I’ve been working with 16mm film, making some more “artsy” pieces. And I’ve just started another appropriated media piece that comments on the way that women are viewed/treated within society. Sort of a feminist re-telling of rom coms and normative romance. That will probably be part of a series of short films that include “Normal Porn for Normal People”.

Audience feedback for Normal Porn for Normal People Directed by Amber Rose McNeill as part of the HORROR Underground Film & Screenplay Festival 2020

WILDSOUND PODCAST 2020 WITH GUEST AMBER ROSE MCNEILL

Director and Producer Amber Rose McNeill chats about violence in media, sex on film, and serial killers